You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-23 points

If only people here bothered to try and understand how nuanced actual politics are and that shit can’t be simplified so easily just because you happen to think in simple terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Simple terms… like “SJW”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Yep. Like SJW. The people that don’t do shit but whine on the internet, then disappear until they next election year only to find something to whine about and use as an excuse to urge people not to vote over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

you’re the one unironically calling people SJW’s. i think the matter at hand is extremely simple lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

So you think trade agreements that go back decades and overcoming partisan congressional policy is simple?

Why aren’t you doing it then, bud?

Because from where I see things, just simply saying:

“I don’t like when he cOmMiTs a gEnOciDe!”

isn’t doing shit to stop it- and is only hurting the chances anyone has to not make it exponentially worse when Donald “let’s finish the job” Trump takes over.

Because you see, although you seem to get upset when I call people propagandists, it’s not a huge leap to make when you’ve asked these people time and time again how they can justify urging people not to vote knowing it’ll be so much worse if Trump wins. How about I start calling them “bigots” because they will knowingly be causing our LGBTQ+ friends and family to suffer by allowing a Trump victory to happen. Or what about I call them “misogynists” for allowing Trump to win and run roughshod over women’s rights?

Considering the matter at hand, I think propagandist is a nice and relevant catch-all to describe those that are urging people not to vote against Trump.

Oh also, most of these people have no suggestions for who they’d have take Biden’s place that has any chance of winning the White House, but they seem to k ow Biden is not the guy. Again, from where I stand- if you’re not offering a solution to your suggestion, it’s not a valid suggestion. Someone gets elected regardless if you vote or not.

So if it’s okay with you, I’m going to call out the propaganda when I see it- as I see it without your permission.

Cool?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I bow to your clearly highly nuanced take of checks notes “people who care about social justice are a bunch of whiners who are bad at politics”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It’s pretty well understood that the term SJW represents your typical keyboard warrior that whines about politics they don’t like or understand during election years to the point that they will urge people not to vote only to spend the time between election years complaining about the results of their inaction.

They’re not part of the solution, they’re part of the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

From the sorts of things I’ve seen, it’s anyone with “blue hair and pronouns”, particularly if they have had a particularly viral moment that can be easily inserted into “Woke SJWs OWNED” clip compilations. Typing on a keyboard doesn’t make for very good visual content, but I suppose posts clipped to show how cringe SJWs are is probably what you’re referring to.

Somehow, I doubt you have a full picture of their political activities based only off what someone else was able to turn into ragebait.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 8.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 693

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments