You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
30 points
*

fyi they updated their blog post with this catch-all disclaimer in the last couple of hours

“it is simply too big to categorically endorse or not endorse”

“so we’re gonna play it safe and endorse it”

permalink
report
reply
20 points

it turns out the only staff member, or one of very few, is the interim ED. Everyone else quit a couple of months ago because she was fucking terrible. I suspect she’s counting sugar lumps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

that fits the tone of this stubborn defense

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

categorical

situational

Alright then, point out the situations where there are good actors in the AI space. Oh, there are none? that would imply that materially the whole category is corrupt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

“Because we got paid, cause we got paid, cause we got pa-aid!”

To the tune of “Then I got high” by Afroman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ahh pussies. I ran the sherlock holmes kink meme a few years back, at one point we had the proto-chat generated fics start to uptick in the community.

We banned them

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators