“… The “dirty secret” of the insurance industry is that most denials can be successfully appealed…”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
56 points

Interesting idea, but I imagine it suffers from similar issues to writing legal opinions: by signing your name to it, you’re swearing that it’s all true. Given AI’s propensity for making things up, you need to check everything.

I wouldn’t be surprised if ‘knowingly filing a false appeal’ is a reason to boot you off the plan in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

It’s still a lot easier to review and understand something you weren’t able to write than to also write that same thing without knowing how to write it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Indeed. Just need to remember that AI can and will hallucinate entire studies or court cases into existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wouldn’t be surprised if ‘knowingly filing a false appeal’ is a reason to boot you off the plan in the first place.

For that to be an issue you would have to “know” it was false.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You signed it, verifying that you knew what it entailed. That’s what the comment was pointing out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Usually when signing things off like this, it’s affirming that you believe all statements to be true. They would have to prove you willingly lied, not that you were simply wrong, which is very difficult to prove legally.

That said, IANAL.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s the legal code if you THINK something is true and you affirm it, but you are wrong. It can’t be the same as lying since you thought it was true.

I really wonder what the law says on something like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

by signing your name to it, you’re swearing that it’s all true.

Lawyers too use qualifiers like ‘To the best of our knowledge’ and ‘in our studied opinion’ to indicate that opinions may differ. That’s why judges exist, and some of them are -so reasonable- that they will accept that people cannot be expected to decide whether a hospital’s decision to operate -immediately- is not good enough.

These US ‘insurance’ companies are in the business of making money from people’s health problems. In MOST OF THE CIVILIZED WORLD that’s not how health-care works. We, the people of the US, let the system get rigged this way … we have to fix that. Permanently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think when you use AI to write the claim and there turn it to be errors even after you checked it, it could still be a case of negligence. Like, not that I think it necessarily should be, but I can see that one could make the argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

!health@lemmy.world

Create post

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you’re not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 534

    Posts

  • 1.7K

    Comments