The head of Telegram, Pavel Durov, has been charged by the French judiciary for allegedly allowing criminal activity on the messaging app but avoided jail with a €5m bail.

The Russian-born multi-billionaire, who has French citizenship, was granted release on condition that he report to a police station twice a week and remain in France, Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau said in a statement.

The charges against Durov include complicity in the spread of sexual images of children and a litany of other alleged violations on the messaging app.

His surprise arrest has put a spotlight on the criminal liability of Telegram, the popular app with around 1 billion users, and has sparked debate over free speech and government censorship.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
52 points

Now do Zuckerberg and Musk

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Don’t leave out Spez.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Meta is literally ad platform for scam. But it’s american, so it’s ok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s the same shit. I was advertised psylocibin shit on facebook before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The problem is that those guys comply with the requests from governments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

do you agree with this arrest or are you pointing out the double standards ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I don’t really understand how he allowed crime. I can commit crime via sms, whatsapp, signal or mail. Does that mean they allow it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can commit crime via sms, whatsapp, signal or mail.

But you’re not allowed to

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think the distinction here is that if your phone provider, WhatsApp, Signal or mail carrier is informed that someone is engaging in illegal activity using their service, these entities would comply and give the information they have on you-- be it a lot like SMS or a little like Signal (phone number, registration date).

In the case of Telegram, they’ve been informed countless times that specific individuals are engaging in blatantly illegal activity and unlike the previously mentioned entities, Telegram is refusing to comply with any legal requests.

I believe that’s the situation but if I’m wrong, by all means correct me because this is a very interesting subject.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Presumably Moxie as well since I’m constantly being told that Signal is the most secure e2ee platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Telegram holds the keys, Signal doesn’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s right, Signal only holds phone numbers for some unspecified reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not the place

permalink
report
parent
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments