You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
21 points

Publishing it under GPL does benefit the humanity because any improvement on it will be also available to everyone. Letting corps take your work and put a monetary/legal block for people to use freely doesn’t seem like benefiting humanity that much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, it will not be available to everyone. Just the clients of the corpo and they can request the source. If you’re not a client, you still have no rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What if your open source code is awful and is unusable, and a company comes in and makes it actually useful? What if it’s used in a medical device that saves hundreds of peoples lives every day?

You’ve now gone from free but unusable, to also fee an unusable, but in addition to paid and actually useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

First of all, in many cases, writing new code is lot easier than trying to modify/salvage old code from someone else. Unless you can just plug it in for a modular function in that case your code is not useless.

And if they think your code is valuable enough to save that many people after they improve it, they can approach you for dual license or other agreements. They pay people with patent all the time, so they can do the same for people who’s volunteering their time for open source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 910

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments