You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
67 points

What’s the twist? There must be some reason.

permalink
report
reply
121 points
*

I guess it’s simply the framing: It was a not very actively maintained open source project. So they’ve decided to turn it over to a new maintainer. Calling that ‘donation’ is a bit pushing it

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Most of the time a company does something like this they would just let it die. It’s good that Microsoft have at least made the effort to hand it over to a team who’s willing to keep it going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

…Like MS-DOS getting open sourced. It’s pretty much worthless unless you need to use some really old device.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s certainly good, I’m not arguing that. My point is, if the wine team is interested, they can fork the unmaintained project, and work on that. Eventually, people will switch over to the active fork. What Microsoft is doing, is helping the process along, and making it easier. So it’s good, and helpful - but not really a “donation” to winehq.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So it’s like “gifting” someone a puppy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

What’s the twist? There must be some reason.

.NET runs natively on Linux since quite some time. Honestly, I don’t get what Mono is even good for these days. Maybe reverse engineering old .NET versions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

.net core is the future but Mono is still important for running legacy .net framework applications like ones that use WinForms or WPF. That’s pretty much it. Anything new should go straight to .net core.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hm, WinForms and WPF with Wine you mean? Otherwise makes not much sense. Was WPF ever run in this combination!

permalink
report
parent
reply

.NET runs natively on Linux

Only .NET Core sadly

When I moved my personal laptop to Linux I needed WINE to run some source-available .NET apps that were written targeting the Windows-only .NET Framework

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

All the new stuff is now on .NET Core/5.0 and up at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hasn’t been called “.NET Core” since 3.1

Although it’s essentially the subsequent version of core, .NET 5 is the successor to both .NET Core 3.1 and .NET Framework 4.

Since then, it’s just been called .NET 5/6/7/8/…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

IIRC Mono was mostly used for WASM as it was optimized for smaller builds than the full fat CoreCLR (talking about .NET non-Framework Mono)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

WASM? Are you talking about WebAssembly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Cost cutting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Probably simply that they are done with it (mono specifically, and possibly .net framework in the long run)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I would be extremely surprised if they are planning to abandon .NET

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

With ICAAN introduction of new gTLDs now they can drop .NET and pick up .ONLINE

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well they said .NET Framework, and I also wouldn’t be surprised if they more or less wrapped that up - .NET Framework specifically means the old implementation of the CLR, and it’s been pretty much superseded by an implementation just called .NET, formerly known as .NET Core (definitely not confusing at all, thanks Microsoft). .NET Framework was only written for Windows, hence the need for Mono/Xamarin on other platforms. In contrast, .NET is cross-platform by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They officially don’t care about running .NET applications on Linux anymore. They never really did before but so few people fell for that trap Microsoft is finally ready to turn in the towel

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Huh, you are very much mistaken. Since .NET they have official and vast support for running on Linux and MacOS. Before they didn’t and hence Mono/Xamarin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s more they are focused on running ASP and CLI apps on Linux, there is no official MS GUI library/framework for Linux which is one big thing missing from modern .net, there are a couple of thrid party ones like Avalonia however.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What the hell are you talking about?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They are saying very little in Linux world moved to .NET/C# : https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=mono

It’s just not popular in Linux world despite MS attempts to make it so. It’s a Windows people language.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 91K

    Comments