16GB of RAM Could Be the New Minimum in Apple's Upcoming M4 Macs(www.macrumors.com)

posted 4 months ago

nave@lemmy.ca

technology@lemmy.world

209 commentshide report

Sort:

Hot Top Controversial New Old

You are viewing a single thread.

View all comments

[ - ]

katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone

20 points

4 months ago

and maximum since you probably won’t be able to upgrade it since silicon doesn’t allow upgrades

permalink

report

[ - ]

stellargmite@lemmy.world

13 points

4 months ago

Yeh can upgrade them at purchase. From 256gb storage to 512gb will only cost you one kidney.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Echo Dot@feddit.uk

7 points

4 months ago

It’s not an upgrade though it’s just a different model. They’re not modules you can install and I don’t even think Apple can install them you just get a different motherboard.

Which is objectionable for so many reasons, not least of all E-Waste.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

stellargmite@lemmy.world

0 points

4 months ago

Yeh I get that. Its treated as if its an upgrade - a sales upsell to a different unit I guess, rather than an upgrade to the literal unit the customer is receiving. Yep objectionable all round.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Echo Dot@feddit.uk

3 points

4 months ago

My point is you cannot effectively upgrade after the fact. You have to buy a whole new device.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca

1 point

4 months ago

There’s reasons behind this. LPDDR IIRC works most efficiently when it’s closer to the CPU than what dimms would allow for.

Boosts speed and lowers the power requirements.

It also incentivizes people to buy larger SKUs than they originally wanted, which, bluntly, is probably the main driver for going that direction… I’m just saying that there’s technical reasons too

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

1 point

4 months ago

The technical benefits are honestly quite overblown. The M-series didn’t get the massive speed lift because it moved to soldered RAM near the CPU, it got the massive speed lift because it doesn’t have to copy stuff between the CPU and GPU, the proximity to the CPU is a pretty modest improvement. So they could’ve gotten 95% of the benefit while still offering socketed RAM, but they decided not to, probably to drive prices up.

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

[ - ]

stellargmite@lemmy.world

1 point

4 months ago

Indeed. Making that initial decision even more of a forced decision toward the expensive upsell. Its evil. And wasteful as you said.

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

[ - ]

qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website

-1 points

4 months ago

Deleted by creator

permalink

report

parent

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

14K
Monthly active users
6.8K
Posts
155K
Comments

Our Rules

Approved Bots

Community stats

Community moderators