You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
29 points
*

The article is based on a study in Autism for which it doesn’t give a link, title, date, or authors. After searching that journal, I believe the source study is this: Non-autistic observers both detect and demonstrate the double empathy problem when evaluating interactions between autistic and non-autistic adults (Jones, D. R., Botha, M., Ackerman, R. A., King, K., & Sasson, N. J., Dec 2023).

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It could also be this: Cheang, R. T., Skjevling, M., Blakemore, A. I., Kumari, V., & Puzzo, I. (2024). Do you feel me? Autism, empathic accuracy and the double empathy problem. Autism, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241252320

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That fits too, and the article does quote two of that paper’s coauthors… although it doesn’t identify them as coauthors of the study in question, and it’s common for science journalism to get opinions on a study from scientists who have done similar work.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@mander.xyz

Create post

General discussions about “science” itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

Community stats

  • 538

    Monthly active users

  • 126

    Posts

  • 342

    Comments