She was driving 120km/h in a 50km/h school zone.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
30 points

Seniors should not be allowed to drive.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Humans should not be allowed to drive at greater than a running speed anyplace they might encounter another human.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Every driver should be regularly retested. People can develop bad habits, vision can change, reaction times can change, the rules of the road change, yet we trust people to drive safely forever after just a handful of tests while they are teenagers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

But that would be too expensive! /s

I say too bad. Donโ€™t do something if you canโ€™t do it correctly so we shouldnโ€™t allow cars into cities if we arenโ€™t going to make it as safe as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

As long as our infrastructure is the way it is driving is a fundamental necessity, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Seniors should have quality public transport options to use and bike/walking infrastructure for short trips or mobility scooters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Iโ€™d say periodic testing is warranted for all drivers. A lot of people shouldnโ€™t be driving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Thatโ€™s just more theatre. Testing is waaaay too easy. Since Canada (in this case) is such a car centric society without suitable alternatives, the testing is barely a check box. The government knows it is too challenging to live without a license for the average person.

Still probably a good idea though, at least it gets the really sketchy people off the roads.

Edit: grammar

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If your testing is useless, thatโ€™s another problem. A test that doesnโ€™t test what you want to test doesnโ€™t pass the test.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah but letting old people drive is like letting blind people drive. Sometimes literally.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Your license is valid for 10 years and to renew it you have to re-test. Most states could double the dmv budget and barely blink and if it was federal it would be even easierโ€ฆ but we canโ€™t have nice things, and more idiots on the roads crashing means more cars, more sales, more insurance, more collisions, more chaos, more more more!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Iโ€™ve lived in countries where test validity decreases with age. So a senior would be tested more frequently.

The nature of the test is important too. If your test canโ€™t capture risky behavior, itโ€™s not doing much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They should, but they should have to undergo regular evaluations from both their doctor and licensing agency. To counter this, they should also be offered free lifetime public transit passes and significant discounts for taxis, ride-hailing apps, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Letโ€™s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Donโ€™t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Donโ€™t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly donโ€™t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, letโ€™s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesnโ€™t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 523

    Posts

  • 8.8K

    Comments