You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
14 points

I think Ghandi led a non-violent revolution, to be fair

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Ghandi’s revolution succeeded through mass noncompliance.

Nonviolence was a luxury Ghandi could afford during the revolution because Indians outnumbered British soldiers by something like 20k to 1. There was no world where the recently weakened UK (after WW2) could hold India once it decided to become independent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Point seems to have been that it was a succesful non-violent revolution

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

The article I posted above gets into this, but it was not. The British did not quit India because some guy went on a hunger strike, and they actively propagate pacifist myths like his because they are completely unthreatening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Communism

!communism@lemmy.ml

Create post

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 294

    Posts

  • 585

    Comments