It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.
8 points
-2 points
No shit? Let me guess; you’re still using git like Linus intended it to be, decentralized, by emailing each other tar.gz’s
3 points
*
No. I’m just not willing to attribute a COMPANY as the sole owner/stakeholder in a protocol that honestly has very little to do with them.
Just because Github does something, doesn’t mean that they represent git.
0 points
