And that, my friend, is a fallacy fallacy (or Argumentum ad logicam if you wish to be posh as heck).
Pointing out your opponent fallacies doesn’t make yours valid. I’d also add that this is not a Stawman fallacy, as he does not attempt to replace your (absence of) argument with one that he refutes, but rather an Ad Hominem.
Edit : I’d add that yours is also an Ad Hominem, which makes it quite ironic.
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
9K
Monthly active users
1.9K
Posts
24K
Comments
