64

Intel chip bug FAQ: Which PCs are affected, how to get the patch, and everything else you need to know(www.zdnet.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Gsus4@programming.dev
in
Avatar
technology@lemmy.world
15 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
12 points
*

And here I thought, it would be good to go for Intel. Recently got a new PC with 14600KF. However, I have not had any issues with performance besides Deathloop (Launches, black screen and then dissapears).

EDIT: So I guess, I’m forced to wait until my motherboard developer/ company (MSI) announces that their users can update their BIOS manually? I’m curious whether, I’m actually affected by this or not. Though I guess, never gonna go Intel again. Next new PC will be having AMD (unless AMD makes such a mess as well, then it does not matter).

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
Gsus4@programming.devOP
-4 points
*

e.g. https://www.yahoo.com/tech/ryzen-3000-fix-sinkclose-vulnerability-183025768.html AMD has these sorts of flaws too, I don’t know enough to tell if AMD is significantly better at this when deciding to buy

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
partial_accumen@lemmy.world
22 points

That AMD security vulnerability doesn’t physically damage the CPU while this Intel flaw does. Thats a drastic difference so the two are not the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
13 points

So far the AMD security flaws aren’t causing physical CPU damage, so Intel definitely wins the screw up award.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
10 points

That exploit required kernel access to begin with, which at that point, you have much bigger problems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
BombOmOm@lemmy.world
6 points
*

Unfortunately, this problem is larger than a micro-code update. The main issue the user is likely referring to is Intel shipping defective product (oxidation issues), denying warranty claims for said defective product, then staying quiet when it’s proven they have been shipping defective product. Intel could have owned up to the issue and proactively recalled defective units, but, they didn’t do the honorable thing, not even close.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 131K

    Comments

Community moderators