You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-5 points

Legitimate targets for what?

Who! not what, we are people too.

Legitimate targets for anyone with honor and dignity. People normally don’t like foreign soldiers strutting around their land or water. I know you wouldn’t tolerate Chinese or Russian navies doing the same. Don’t expect us to accept what you wouldn’t.

Who wants to fight the US Navy?

Lots do. Even if the means are limited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lots do. Even if the means are limited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

Notice the USS Cole is still there. I guarantee they’re still pissed about that. Not the ship you want to target again. They’re likely to overreact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

We are betting on their overreaction. The US was defeated in Afghanistan and it can be defeated again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My question was for what actions? Do you seriously think you can sink a US warship? At least pretend to be credible when making inane threats.

That said, the last foreign army occupying my homeland was Russian, depending on whether you consider foreign Chinese policemen on your streets a foreign army.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Do you seriously think you can sink a US warship?

I can’t but someone in the region might be able to.

the last foreign army occupying my homeland was Russian

then you should be able to relate instead of ridicule

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If someone there managed to sink a US warship, the US will invade and destroy everything in the area in response. That is an escalation no one wants. They’re attacking civilian shipping because they can’t fight back effectively.

The US destroyed Afghanistan in retaliation for 9/11 and they didn’t even have anything to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think they meant “what” would attacking them accomplish. It just starts a useless fight with nothing to gain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

There is a lot to be gained even if each and every projectile is shot down. It is a war of attrition.

A $2M missile vs. a $2,000 drone: Pentagon worried over cost of Houthi attacks

“That quickly becomes a problem because the most benefit … is in their favor,” one expert said.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/missile-drone-pentagon-houthi-attacks-iran-00132480

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t see how that helps anyone. They both lose; just at different rates.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Middle East and North Africa

!mena@lemm.ee

Create post

Rules:

Rule 0. Comments must be on topic, off topic comments lead to immediate ban. Off topic comments are any comments that will lead to diverging from the post’s topic. If you want to discuss something post about it.

Rule 1. No refutation without a source. Any bias against MENA sources could lead to a ban if not backed with evidence. The burden of proof is on you.

Rule 2. This community is first and foremost for people from the region. Foreigners trying to justify military intervention or genocide are not welcomed.

Breaking of these rules may result in a 500-3000 day ban.

Community stats

  • 103

    Monthly active users

  • 166

    Posts

  • 164

    Comments