You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-8 points
*

AFAIK a lot are there to protect trading ship routes that have been attacked by rebels or so.

A failed mission so far, and could have been avoided if they stopped the genocide in Gaza. The Yemeni military said so multiple times they will stop if the genocide stops.

Some were probably helping with the makeshift port they wanted to use to supply trapped starving Palestinians.

Another failed mission and unnecessary. The US could have demanded Israel open up its ports and border crossings for aid. The US could have conditioned the bombs it sends to facilitate the genocide on allowing aid in.

Dunno who authorized it, but it’s also not important, because those ships are cruising around in international waters anyway. They minimize the time docked in ports for strategic reasons. They also get authorization from that nation when entering territorial waters, except if they are in a hostile situation with that nation, of course.

All I see is legitimate non-grata targets, I won’t act on it, but others in the region might.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Legitimate targets for what? Who wants to fight the US Navy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Legitimate targets for what?

Who! not what, we are people too.

Legitimate targets for anyone with honor and dignity. People normally don’t like foreign soldiers strutting around their land or water. I know you wouldn’t tolerate Chinese or Russian navies doing the same. Don’t expect us to accept what you wouldn’t.

Who wants to fight the US Navy?

Lots do. Even if the means are limited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My question was for what actions? Do you seriously think you can sink a US warship? At least pretend to be credible when making inane threats.

That said, the last foreign army occupying my homeland was Russian, depending on whether you consider foreign Chinese policemen on your streets a foreign army.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think they meant “what” would attacking them accomplish. It just starts a useless fight with nothing to gain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lots do. Even if the means are limited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

Notice the USS Cole is still there. I guarantee they’re still pissed about that. Not the ship you want to target again. They’re likely to overreact.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Middle East and North Africa

!mena@lemm.ee

Create post

Rules:

Rule 0. Comments must be on topic, off topic comments lead to immediate ban. Off topic comments are any comments that will lead to diverging from the post’s topic. If you want to discuss something post about it.

Rule 1. No refutation without a source. Any bias against MENA sources could lead to a ban if not backed with evidence. The burden of proof is on you.

Rule 2. This community is first and foremost for people from the region. Foreigners trying to justify military intervention or genocide are not welcomed.

Breaking of these rules may result in a 500-3000 day ban.

Community stats

  • 103

    Monthly active users

  • 166

    Posts

  • 164

    Comments