You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

Why not save animals from unsafe/illegal conditions and provide enrichment, without turning the animals into an attraction?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the attraction rallies support for preserving and protecting their natural habitat. Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, but conservation is not a binary condition. Zoos are responsible for more conservation than we would otherwise have without them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I love when people like you suddenly come up with a hot take that absolutely no one has ever thought through ever in the past hundreds of years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i too can come up with technically true statements that are completely useless

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because people wouldn’t support spending their taxes on it without making them aware of the value. Which is done by educating them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 112

    Posts

  • 1.2K

    Comments