You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

I mean, it’s a bomb fueled by the hydrogen fuel cell in the vehicle. Not sure what else you would call it when trying to differentiate it from something a traditional car or one made from a truck filled with ammonium nitrate.

Yes the term Hydrogen Bomb also refers to a thermonuclear device, but the same two word term han have different, yet similar, meanings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

A hydrogen bomb is a thermonuclear weapon, so almost anything other than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hydrogen is a very simple atom, so how about cslling it the atom bomb?

edit: /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That name is also already taken. An atom bomb usually refers to the first generation of nuclear bombs that use only fission, e.g., those used in WWII. The hydrogen bomb refers to the second generation of nuclear bombs that use a chain reaction of nuclear fission and fusion to create bombs that are orders of magnitude more powerful.

For comparison, Fat Man was ~20 kilotons and the largest ever bomb (Tsar Bomba) was ~50,000 kilotons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

And why would Yahoo Autos be where you found out Ukraine detonated a thermonuclear weapon in Russia?

The internet was a mistake. Everyone lost the ability for critical thinking or to even look where an article is from apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You don’t deserve to be downvoted for this. It’s a bomb, that uses hydrogen as fuel, what else would you call it?

And yes, Yahoo Autos is definitely not where you’d hear about this first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

no one says hydrogen bomb referring to conventional arms. it’s not a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

no one says hydrogen bomb referring to conventional arms.

Bold claim, considering you’re posting in a thread where the article does exactly that. 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

fortunately, this stupid thread doesn’t encompass the rest of the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD.

bold claim? pull your head out

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I’d also say a majority of people also don’t know the term in relation to nuclear weapons either. The average person is extremely uneducated about anything nuclear. They don’t know what differences between the original bombs the US dropped and modern nuclear weapons weapons might be. Even post-Oppenheimer film.

Differentiating between Nuclear and Thermonuclear weapons is something pedants in online forums do, not normies in the real world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I completely disagree with you. A hydrogen bomb has meant nuclear weapons for 50ish years to anyone with a passing familiarity - and a whole shitton of people learned during the cold war that there were nuclear and thermonuclear weapons, they built fucking shelters in their back yards lol.

so no, disagree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s journalistic malpractice to not call it something that would differentiate it from a nuke. Simply calling it “a hydrogen cell bomb” or “a bomb fueled by hydrogen” would still be just as accurate and not imply it’s a nuke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

On the flip side, Ukraine detonating a nuke wouldn’t be something we’re discovering about on Yahoo Autos. That would be all over mainstream news everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply