cross-posted from: https://lemmy.cringecollective.io/post/75583

why isn’t it ok? why???

Meme “the number of people who think this is an abomination” over a photo of a USB-A to USB-A cable, “but think this is perfectly acceptable” over a photo of a USB-C to USB-C cable, “makes me sick.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
149 points

Huh, I’m not sure they are comparable.

Didn’t USB A and USB B use a master-slave relationship in which the male would (generally) always be the slave, whereas USB C uses agreement and discussion to decide the master and slave roles regardless of connector gender.

Please do correct me if I’m wrong. Also, do we say “agent” now instead of “slave”, or what is the new term?

permalink
report
reply
146 points

I believe the common terms now are “domme” and “sub”

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I can’t tell if this is real life or sarcasm…

Did I really miss the memo on this one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

No that’s the lingo the professionals use these days

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m going to refer to myself as USB-B from now on

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

I think the biggest problem I see with A to A is: who’s delivering power, and who’s receiving it? Maybe if you use it only with the device it came with then it’ll be fine, but if anyone tries to just hook up that cable to two random computers, it might actually cause a short circuit and fry something.

Whereas Type-C was explicitly made to handle such situations.

Or a shorter reason: Type-C cable is allowed by the spec while Type-A is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hrm. I have a keyboard that requires an A to A cable and I think it works with the cable any way around…

Might be wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It makes sense, if I remember correctly the older USB cable (i.e. everything before Type-C) are passive, so as long as the pins are wired symmetrically it wouldn’t matter which side is which. But whoever made your keyboard really blundered, there is no reason in the world why anyone would do this. There’s so many options: the B connector, mini USB, micro USB. All would make sense to put in the keyboard. A just doesn’t.

Let me guess: you got it from an ultra cheap online store? AliExpress/Wish/Temu?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve actually used this to my advantage. I bought some cheap speaker/light combos which basically made the lights dance to the music. The only power connector was a wire that comes straight out of the device and into an outlet. But it did have a USB port for loading music from a USB stick. So naturally I plugged one side of a USB A into the port and the other side into a power bank and it just straight up worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

master/slave could be primary/secondary, primary/subordinate or principle/agent, so you’re correct on that replacement.

I personally am a big fan of “Mantrap” becoming an “Access Control Vestibule” mostly because it’s fun to say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I like controller/peripheral, which is the most descriptive in my opinion. That’s what’s commonly used for SPI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve been using parent/child, I guess that’s not always correct?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

In the usb world its “host” and “device”, not “master” and “slave”.
But yes you are right

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Both ends of a USB cable are generally male (unless you’re talking about an extender). Generally the type B end (in mini, micro, or full configuration) would be the client though I have seen a couple of clients use Mini or Micro A.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah we’ve been going by primary-secondary where I am for the just 6 to 7 years now but I don’t think a universally agreed replacement for the terms exists yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Mechanics are still trying to figure that out with the “master cylinder” and “slave cylinder”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think reusing server/client naming for USB connectivity instead of master/slave would fit it

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 947

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators