I’ve looked but I can’t find anything regarding this besides him running some kind of giveaway and breaking a no purchase necessary law. Is that what you’re referring to?
Angry Autist is a Spez plant. Don’t let him destabilize this community. Block and move on.
… it’s literally in the video… Twice…
And now because I know you are here to do nothing but waste my time, you will probably ask me for a timestamp, and I would normally provide it of course because I want to keep the discussion intellectually honest.
But it’s pretty clear that you don’t, and of course after ignoring my timestamp hyperlink, you will make up some vapid arguments on how it is unpossible for Mr Least to ever have done such a thing and that I’m stupid for misunderstanding federal gambling laws.
And we can go back and forth for hours, me posting evidence, you saying whatever stupid shit that comes to your mind to push the discussion far away from the original point that Mr. Least is illegally involving children in gambling.
And I am so just fuckdamn tired of intellectually dishonest people like you ‘just asking questions’.
So
Amazingly
Fuckdamn
Tired.
So you’re blocked now.
Lmao Jesus Christ. It’s a 50 minute video that I was actively watching and I was reading comments and watching at the same time.
Anyone that’s not a maniac want to give me a timestamp? Because I don’t have time to watch a 50 minute video tonight.
I couldn’t find it earlier because I googled “Mr Beast live stream gambling” when I should’ve googled “Mr Beast Child Lottery”
Anyone that’s not a maniac
Your abelism infuriates me. If I were younger, I’d waste an hour rhetorically browbeating you.
You could have already completely watched the video by now but still you are here whining for timestamps just like I predicted you would. The more shitstain forum sliders keep using the same tactics, the easier it is to call your uncreative asses out on it.
Mr. Least encouraged children to gamble, broke gambling laws to increase buying pressure, and even less shocking apparently hasn’t made good on most of the ‘winners’ anyway.
Yet you are here pretending he just accidentally bent a few obscure sweepstakes laws instead of the critical point that he USED HIS INFLUENCE OVER CHILDREN TO CONVINCE THEM TO GAMBLE!
