“Last month, Mozilla made a quiet change in Firefox that caused some diehard users to revolt…”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
37 points

Laura Chambers, who stepped into an interim CEO role at Mozilla in February, says the company is reinvesting in Firefox after letting it languish in recent years,

It’s sort of amusing to me that Mozilla would let the Firefox browser languish. Is that not the raison d’etre of your entire organization? What are you doing with your time and effort if you are allowing your core product to languish? What would people say if Microsoft said “yeah, we’ve allowed windows to languish in recent years.” What an insane notion.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

They’ve got thunderbird which is as far as I know the only serious alternative to outlook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And I wouldn’t call it serious, the performance is atrocious.

It’s so bad I went and installed outlook from 2016

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re not arguing from a position of strength if your personal anecdote is performance issues, 8 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Kinda but Thunderbird is community driven, and spun out into an independent subsidiary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

What would people say if Microsoft said “yeah, we’ve allowed windows to languish in recent years.”

Well, I think they did let it languish, if looking at it being enshittified in recent last ~10 years. Also, it’s not their core product anymore. Almost nobody buys a windows license anymore, because piracy was already high, and they let you keep your license from the previous version so whether you had one or not, most probably now you have.
I think Microsoft’s core product has not been windows for a long time, but their cloud services, and maybe office and the other common business tools.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Let me tell my management they no longer have to pay windows license for the ~10,000 user machines, and then the servers.

While a single consumer can get away with it (and MS doesn’t care because it means they’re using Windows and likely using MS services, all while getting telemetry from the desktops), it’s far from “nobody buys a windows license any more”.

Even SMB’s will pay, because if they don’t MS will hammer them financially. No SMB could stand up to what MS can do to them - $200 windows license is cheap insurance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Let me tell my management they no longer have to pay windows license for the ~10,000 user machines, and then the servers.

Current sales are nothing compared to earlier windows versions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There was a graphic here a while ago. What was it, about 4/5 are Azure and Office 365, Windows less than 1/5.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments