You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

I still haven’t heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Mainly conflicts with mDNS. However it’s shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That I agree with. Microsoft drafted the recommendation to use it for local networks, and Apple ignored it or co-opted it for mDNS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

.local is already used by mDNS/Zeroconf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You mean mDNS/Zeroconf are using a tld that was already being used.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Tell me you don’t share a net with Macs without using those words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Macs aren’t the only thing that use mDNS, either. I have a host monitoring solution that I wrote that uses it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Even on windows sometimes depending on the target host, I’ve had to type host.local. (Final dot to do exact match) instead of host.local

This didn’t seem to affect other domains. I’m assuming it was due to special handling of .local

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

mDNS hasn’t been a just-Apple thing for decades. Do you still call it Ren-dess-voos like the Gaston character in Beauty and the Beast?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’ve also used .local but .local could imply a local neighborhood. The word itself is based on “location”. Maybe a campus could be .local but the smaller networks would be .internal

Or, maybe they want to not confuse it with link-local or unique local addresses. Though, maybe all .internal networks should be using local (private) addresses?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My main issue was it doesn’t play well with Macs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments