You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
46 points

sure, but what os wouldn’t break if you did this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Just about any Linux I’ve ever used keeps the previous kernel version and initrd around. And nowadays snapper makes a new snapshot before and after every package installation or update.

So, I’d think there are a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So what I’m hearing is install Linux-LTS and pacsnap

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Plus in Linux you can actually fix this with a live USB, while on Windows you can run startup repair and hope for the best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

In Windows you can also fix this with a live Windows USB, manually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Windows doesn’t in my experience, it’s surprisingly robust.

But also I thought Linux distros normally keep the old Kernel around after an update so stuff like this doesn’t cause a boot failure?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah windows “cumulative update” upgrades for the past couple of years basically duplicate the whole system directory and apply the update to that leaving the existing one to roll back to if anything fails

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Windows updates (and Windows Installer) are transactional. If the update or installation fails, it knows exactly how to revert back to the previous state.

Windows Installer supports this across multiple packages too - for example, a game might need some version of DirectX libraries which needs some version of the Visual C++ runtime (probably showing my age because I doubt games come bundled with DirectX any more). If one of the packages fails to install, it can handle rolling everything back. Linux can sometimes leave your system in a broken state when this happens, requiring you to manually resolve the issue - for example, on a Debian-based system if the postinst script for a package fails.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But also I thought Linux distros normally keep the old Kernel around after an update so stuff like this doesn’t cause a boot failure?

Arch has no concept of “previous package”, so it doesn’t do this.

You could install linux-lts (or one of the other alternative kernels) side by side with the linux package, so you always have a bootable fallback, but like most things on Arch it’s not enforced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s pretty wild, I guess arch is not meant to hold your hand at all so it makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Any immutable distro, Debian, Ubuntu, all their derivatives, Fedora, all its derivatives, OpenSUSE, Slackware, …
Basically, 95+% of installed Linux systems would retain the old or a backup kernel during an upgrade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

good answer to a bad and uninformed question, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Any immutable distro, Debian, Ubuntu, all their derivatives

Debian and Ubuntu are not immutable distributions by default, unless I am mistaken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They weren’t saying Debian and Ubuntu are immutable - they were saying “any immutable distro”, “Debian”, and “Ubuntu” as three separate items in a list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Any immutable distro and Debian and Ubuntu and all their derivatives

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If it was on something like BTRFS it’d probably be fine, though I imagine there’s still a small window where the FS could flush while the file is being written. renameat2 has the EXCHANGE flag to atomically switch 2 files, so if arch maintainers want to fix it they could do

  1. Write to temporary file
  2. Fsync temporary file
  3. Renameat2 EXCHANGE temporary and target
  4. Fsync directory (optional, since a background flush would still be atomic, just might take some time)
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

renameat2

I read this as “rena meat 2” and was very confused

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

it was btrfs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Just having btrfs is not enough, you need to have automatic snapshots (or do them manually) before doing updates and configured grub to allow you to rollback.

Personally, I’m to lazy to configure stuff like that, I rather just pick my Vetroy USB from backpack, boot into live image and just fix it (while learning something/new interesting) than spend time preventing something that might never happen to me :)

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules
2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of “peasantry” to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can’t quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 6.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments