The inside-the-law approach that works to some limited extent is public community rejection. Things like large groups showing up and standing with their back to the Nazis.

The method that has historically stopped Nazis like this involves getting some level of police cooperation and beating them up

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

There were several laws put in place in postwar Germany that specifically suppressed them. This was broadly effective, though I think the modern-day position of the AfD shows it was not completely so.

In the US, any such legislation would be struck down in court as unconstitutional.

So, it’s just not that simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Newsflash: some number of people are absolute shitbags.

If you let them take over and run the show it’s gonna get real bad.

Nazis are absolute shitbags. They will always be around in some number. You need to always suppress them so they don’t fuck up the good shit we have managed to eek out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

eek

eke #boneAppleTea

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Well, yes, you definitely don’t want to let them take over. You want to demonstrate your own strength, and how much you outnumber them.

This is not preventing them from marching in some way, though. That is not doable, it would be illegal. It would also be counterproductive in our current climate of most people underestimating the actual danger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You need to be cautious of the paradox of tolerance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Right, so you start beating the shit out of them until they learn to shut the fuck up and stop showing up. Make them afraid.

permalink
report
parent
reply

New York Times gift articles

!nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

Create post

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 690

    Posts

  • 947

    Comments

Community moderators