You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-15 points

There’s no artistic value to be gained from reading Slaveowner Potter

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ever see boomers writing “cRAP”?

Feels like a literary riff on that, gotta say. The whole thread’s about worldbuilding shortcomings but we’re still here discussing it aren’t we? Clearly it made an impact.

Also - made me think of seeing a Jackson Pollock

& dismissively muttering “I could do that”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

There’s entertainment and thought to be gained, but it’s not of value. It’s neoliberal shit. The books aggressively push a certain set of political beliefs which suck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Think Leni Riefenstahl, there can be valuable art used for utterly despicable ideology. Rowling had a huge impact before it became obvious how much she sucks, because there was value in what she did. There were also ideological problems all along. Value and shitty ideology can exist in art at the same time and it can get pretty confusing for the consumer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

define value

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 8.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 834

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments