feddit.org

0 points

1 year ago

Oh I meant all the features that might needlessly send things to a server like checking spelling as you type, recommending extensions and features as you browse, turning off search suggestions, changing search engine, turning off location requests and most autofills, suggestions from web and sponsors, turning off all data collection and use, enabling https-only mode, etc

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

This is exactly the case why Librewolf is nice. Mullvad browser is a joke, I use the VPN but the browser is not available as Flatpak and lacks the GUI settings page for enabling accounts and setting some switches.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

You can install Mullvad directly from its repo, not having account syncing ability or being able to turn certain things on or off is part of the security features. It’s the same for the Firefox Focus mobile browser. Mullvad is a midpoint between Librewolf and Tor Browser, incorporating letterboxing for anti-fingerprinting. If you want personal information saved for later sessions or synced, you need to use something else, like Librewolf or regular FF.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

Sorry but untrue. Firefox accounts are secure and opt-in. Private browsing is stupid and fingerprintable. So mullvadbrowser has its own fingerprint, and then also disabling private browsing will increase it.

There is no reason to do this. Private browsing is nice, an easily accessible amnesic session. But for a permanent profile just presetting

delete cache, history, session, downloads
delete cookies, dont save to disk

Is enough. Not saving stuff is irrelevant for websites targeting you.

Also, in private browsing container tabs dont work. This would make it useless for me.

Mullvadbrowser is like Torbrowser without Tor, Librewolf without PB too. They have probably the same hardening otherwise.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

I hope you feel better after typing all that, because I didn’t need it.

Don’t know where all the “private browsing” stuff came in, as if I mentioned anything about using a browser’s “privacy mode”, because I didn’t.

You appear to have conflated some of what I said, but I honestly don’t care enough to figure out where. Use whatever you want, it doesn’t matter to me, but casting Mullvad browser as pointless when it just doesn’t fit your particular needs or preferences is just ignorant.

You asked what we’re using, that’s what I’m using.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

No I didnt attack you or something? Huh?

I just said Mullvad is a new browser that simply copies Torbrowser but without Tor. And this is annoying as they are adding a new fingerprintable browser that is uselesd for many works because of PB, so people use plain firefox and think “privacy is uncomfortable”.

Torbrowser is this “anonymity mix kit” that also forgets everything you did. I dont need that as for many threat models its not needed. But its the Torbrowser and thus has a shared fingerprint.

Switching off private browsing to then allow you to save sessions and pinned tabs for example, makes you stick out.

I wrote with the Mullvad Devs already and they dont care. They just copy torbrowser.

Librewolf is the better browser, its not branded and actually has GUI settings added. And they dont use private browsing, even though its amnesic by default, just like arkenfox.

It makes no sense to use Private browsing, and its a pain to deal with

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

Are you done with your Ted talk?

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

You have literally no idea what you’re talking about. If can’t do a simple internet search to check how Firefox’s bookmarks or spellchecking work, not my problem

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

Dont be mean please

report