You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
0 points

I am new to Linux. What’s the differences between Xorg and Wayland?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I’m not an expert on the matter so have a Wikipedia link.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Hahaha Wikipedia and Linux often is a bad combo. Btw just updated the German Fedora entry which was full or Fedora 19 links and references

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m not an erudite so feel free to correct me c:

Wayland is a new implementation on how your system draws windows and components in your computer (I’m not sure if it’s responsible for the content) and it tries a different way to do it compared with xorg.

Xorg is the old implementation, and it has been patched to support most of the new features, and Wayland is trying to get the same features xorg has and some extras.

As a Linux user I have noted that sharing screen is more private in Wayland, also I think multi monitor refresh rate was a problem in xorg. One common issue with Wayland is the GPU compatibility, as far as I know Wayland runs better in AMD GPU I think is because of Mesa integration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Ok the first block was right, the rest very wrong.

Xorg is old, and broken by design. Wayland is completely different and backwards compatible only because it had XWayland, which allows running X11 apps within wayland. Its goal is not to copy any features, but make things work in a reasonable way that users can control and intercept.

On Xorg every program can do anything. Open multiple windows, capture all your inputs from anywhere, record your screen, crash your screen, do random keypresses or inputs in any other application, …

Its a total mess, even though this is mainly a problem with proprietary apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

For a user: In Wayland programs are supposed to draw their own title bar. Java aplications and old applications must use a backwards compatibility layer that can cause flicker and bad font rendering. The terminology is different (compositor = window manager). Some niche new programs may only run on Wayland. Wayland hasn’t been adopted by BSD (AFAIK).

For a programners: Wayland has more modern, tidy code, but not all toolkits support it natively and few are easy. If you code exclusively for Wayland, a lot of users won’t use your program at the moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Titlebar (CSD) has nothing to do with Wayland, just as font rendering afaik

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 8.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 47K

    Comments