The nyquist sampling theorem is a cornerstone of analog to digital conversion. It posits that to adequately preserve an analog signal when converting to digital, you have to use a sampling frequency twice as fast as what a human can sense. This is part of why 44.1 khz is considered high quality audio, even though the mic capturing the audio vibrates faster, sampling it at about 40k times a second produces a signal that to us is indistinguishable from one with an infinite resolution. As the bandwidth our hearing, at best peaks at about 20khz.

I’m no engineer, just a partially informed enthusiast. However, this picture of the water moving, somehow illustrates the nyquist theorem to me. How perception of speed varies with distance, and how distance somehow make things look clear. The scanner blade samples at about 30hz across the horizon.

Scanned left to righ, in about 20 seconds. The view from a floating pier across an undramatic patch of the Oslo fjord.

*edit: I swapped the direction of the scan in OP

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

Double nitpick, according to Wikipedia, your definition is a “minority usage”. I teach signal Processing and hadn’t heard of that one, so thanks for pointing me to it!

Nyquist as half sampling rate is what I use

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency#Other_meanings

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Neat! I’ve definitely originated misunderstandings based on that. I wonder if it comes from my signals class lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

Photography

!photography@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don’t spam.

Community stats

  • 128

    Monthly active users

  • 137

    Posts

  • 302

    Comments

Community moderators