You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points
*

Your logic doesn’t follow. The pipeline was in construction up until recently. Germany suspended it due to the war in Ukraine, but it was previously intending to use it, and it had stake in it. Moreover, Nord stream 1 was also in service before the war, and it was part of the sabotage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And how does the US fit in?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They literally said they would do this lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Do what? Keep Nord Stream 2 from running? Destroying Nord Stream 1?

Neither really makes any sense. Germany threatened Russia on their own volition to stop Nord Stream 2 from running.

With destroying Nord Stream 1 the US gains nothing and besides, if the US actually did say that they would destroy it then why keep the operation so secretive and make it look like sabotage?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.6K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments