Perhaps «monitoring» was too strong of a word…

someone would eventually notice and complain.

I’ll rephrase: if a layperson wanted to check if an instance is not following through, how could they confirm it?

Is this for an online community like Lemmy, or more oriented towards fixing the credit institutions?

in any case, a credibility metric would soon turn into a goal to achieve ^(karmafarming says what?)^

A metric ceases to be useful when it becomes a goal.

( thanks! do you happen to know other instances that have downvotes disabled? up until know, i just knew of BeeHaw. Choosing between an upvote or engaging on conversation is more enticing when you can’t just give a thumbs down and leave the room )

10^^{10^10}

How to monitor which instances ignored the request?

That just seems like someone read about Roko’s basilisk and decided to rebrand that nightmare as the mission/vision of a company.

What a time to be alive!

thanks !

so many movies i wasn’t even aware were Blumhouse productions; I have many to pick now for my Hallooween film list :D

Truth or Dare was so bad it turned out funny.

what is 9?

exactly! trying to plot this is in 2D is hella confusing.

plus the y-axis doesn’t really make sense to me. are we only comparing humans and LLMs? where do turtles lie on this scale? what about parrots?

the e/acc stuff makes them look like a cult

unsure what that acronym means. in what sense are they like a cult?

There needs to be no separation on the ]( for the link to render properly: [text](link)

And while, yeah the wiki is empty, thanks for clearing this one out for the fedi.

at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.

so when bp = 300x - 3, this:

4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

would turn to

4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though

just picture it:

4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000