Thanks. yes i realized the last one, and know of his work.

Looking at the “method”, it doesn’t look like rocket-science. I’d like to know, is the publication itself a fraud or not?

Thanks for the tip.

The internet page says “Potential predatory scholarly open-access journals”

So i hope at least a few read the paper and assess their method

The interview actually had much more interesting content…

Thing is, i see this clip and cringe for the blatant misinfo outed by the media and government.

But others still think this ranting is appropriate😥

i do wonder if they realize e.g.

• The mRna product was not tested and not licensed for stopping transmission.
• The mRna product wasn’t tested on pregnant women before the rollout!