scratchandgame

supporting wine is a shame.

It can read every bit of that partition.

Why don’t more distro use LibreSSL? Why don’t more distro use mandoc? Why don’t more distro use clang?

Send diff to their lists.

The main argument is, the number of Debian’s Apparmor policies is not comparable to RHEL’s SELinux policies.

If anyone saw a guy named AnonymouseJoker posting on any thread about GrapheneOS and criticize it, please ignore. What he is doing is spreading misinformation about an operating system that take a true approach to security. So CIA agents aka “journalists” will not find out a secure operating system to use, and then their phone can explode whenever the Chinese government want.

10 years later: De-Proton your life.

You can’t blend in with a crowd of vanadium users with the amount of data points given away by the browser. Your fingerprint will be decernable from other users. Without actual anti-fingerprinting, which theoretical can allow for a crowd only when fingerprinting of user browsers results in the same fingerprint ID, the best you can hope to do is thwart naive fingerprinting. Vanadium doesn’t have any anti-fingerprint built in, so the slightest differences between user can be used to easily fingerprint. Vanadium

Anti-fingerprinting? By blocking javascript which the half-hearted privacy users can never afford? hahahahaha. Even privacy projects spread dirty javascripts.

The host access is not actually everything

Not as restrictive as chromium’s unveil.

For home it even restrict to the downloads folder, not accessing the whole home directory.

Could you explain “filesystem-unveiled”?

Means its filesystem access is restricted.

For example, chromium on OpenBSD use the unveil(2) system call to restrict itself to /tmp and $HOME/Downloads .

Many popular flatpak applications have filesystem=host. This is equal to restrict all filesystem access and then unveil the whole filesystem.

Apps are not updated to support portals for “compatibility” or just lack of maintenance. Flatpak needs to follow their approach if they want to have many apps being supported.

Desktop Linux doesnt have the marketshare to dictate that all apps need to adopt portals. In the meantime, flathub.org has a rating system and verified checks, this is simply not well shown in KDE Discover and not sure about GNOME software.

If they can’t even enforce portals, flatpak is a new level of complexity.

So I said it is trash.