sbrb

Multiple complex reasons

My initial question was whether the source can be trusted. You answered it, the news outlet can’t be trusted, they have a clear agenda. Thank you ;)

The post is about recognizing statehood, not entitlement to land and life

Falk said: “Is it an irresponsible overstatement to associate the treatment of Palestinians with this criminalized Nazi record of collective atrocity? I think not.” […] “He has taken part in a UN fact-finding mission which determined that suicide bombings were a valid method of ‘struggle’. He has disturbingly charged Israel with ‘genocidal tendencies,’ and accused it of trying to achieve security through ‘state terrorism’. Someone who has publicly and repeatedly stated such views cannot possibly be considered independent, impartial or objective.”

Wikipedia entry in Richard A. Falk

Ok…

No, I was implying there never was a state of Palestine, only Palestinians living in Palestinian territories

What state?

No explanation in the real world is monocausal.

indirectly boosting the militant organization

Maybe it’s more complicated?

Why were you shocked? Why this post? What is this about?

Do they also mention Ubuntu Pro without being asked about it?