einkorn
Well, except Telegram isn’t a good tool for privacy.
There is no E2EE. Simple encryption is only available for 1:1 chats and disabled by default. Telegram doesn’t disclose their encryption methods, so there is no way to verify the (in)effectiveness. Telegram is able to block channels from their end, so there is no privacy from their end either.
highly controversial figure in Germany
Understatement of the year. Courts have repeatedly ruled that calling him fascist and Nazi is a factual statement. He has been sentenced multiple times for using Nazi rhetoric and symbols.
His local chapter of the AFD party has been labeled “assuredly right-wing extremist” by the Verfassungsschutz which again was upheld by court decision as well.
The issue I see with Telegram is that they retain a certain control over the content on their platform, as they have blocked channels in the past. That’s unlike for example Signal, which only acts as a carrier for the encrypted data.
If they have control over what people are able to share via their platform, the relevant laws should apply, imho.
Voraussetzung ist, dass mutmaßlich ein Anschlag des internationalen Terrorismus geplant ist, der den Staat, das Leben oder die Freiheit von Bürgern oder Sachen von allgemeinem Interesse bedroht
Also, mal zynisch gesagt, auch der Status Quo. Geheime Durchsuchen bei der Letzten Generation wann?
I understand people being reluctant to kill others unless absolutely necessary. One reason why I will never work in the defense industry is that here is no way for me to be certain that my work will only ever be used in self-defense.
But in this case? Bucha, attacks on hospitals and abduction of children? What else do these people need to understand what the consequences of not fighting are?
I’d love to see a world where war is a thing of the past, but until then it is necessary and in my opinion even morally required to take up arms and defend those who can not fight.
Doch es gibt Protest, vor allem von Krematorien.
Unternehmen sehen ihr Geschäftsmodell bedroht und verhalten sich reaktionär statt innovativ. Mehr Nachrichten um halb 10.
Doch Rechtsmediziner Püschel – der Krematorien berät und dort Leichenschauen abhält – zweifelt trotzdem an der Methode: […] Allerdings war Püschel bei keiner Kokon-Öffnung dabei – anders als das Team aus Leipzig und Vertreter:innen des Kieler Gesundheitsministeriums.
Wer gibt in unserer Post-Faktischen Welt schon einen Dreck auf empirische Untersuchungen?
Allgemein sind Bestattungen in Deutschland ja eh durch die Kirchen geregelt. Der Staat dient ja nur als Feigenblatt.
Gehen zwei Kommunisten in eine Bar.
Es bilden sich drei Splittergruppen.
Specific groups of hackers often have various markers that appear throughout their various malware.
Reused code fragments are the most obvious one. Others are specific code styles such as variable naming, even formatting. It’s basically the same stuff that is used to determine whether a specific text was most likely written by a specific person.
A new WordStar release? Maybe GRRM can finally finish the two missing ASOIAF books in a timely fashion with it!