TeddE

Or just agree with what your betters want you to think, obviously. </s>

Probably not after it was paid off

Not everyone thinks of dog, there’s a bit of a bell curve.

No, sadly leopards are eating the proletariat faces, but they’re his proletariat faces

🎶 It’s gonna take a lot to drag me away from you 🎶

🎵 There’s nothin’ that a hundred men or more could ever do 🎵

🎶 I bless the rains in South America 🎶

Yay. This is excellent news and hopefully the beginning of a trend.

No source code is perfect, and the xz utils vulnerability highlights how having everything fall to enthusiasts alone isn’t perfect. Adding some state level actors into the soup will hopefully add some additional validation to many key tool chains. (I wouldn’t trust state actors alone, as some governments clearly don’t have their citizens best interests at heart, but as another set of eyes to a public source, I think is good)

Cracking a phone is pretty doable. Cracking phones in a way that will hold up in a court trial, much more formal.

I thought her insights were practical and grounded. Do you disagree about the factual nature of their anecdote about engagement with cameras off? Or that the anecdote isn’t indicative of general audiences? Would you care to elaborate on what you mean by “what actual people are actually like”?

It’s worse then that. They’re actively profiting from that discount rate, meaning they’re ludicrously profiting from everyone who doesn’t spend half their life getting discount codes (the cost of convenience)

Yep yep. Was hoping someone would call me out on that. 😝