Samsuma

What “healthy European” freedom looks like:

• West votes against democracy, human rights, cultural diversity at UN; promotes mercenaries, sanctions
• West opposes rest of world in UN votes for fairer economic system, equality, sustainable development
• China condemns ‘racist’ Western hypocrisy over Ukraine: You ignore victims in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Palestine
• Pro-Palestine activists are under attack in Europe
• Censorship in Europe: Major Palestinian news channels banned on Telegram
• Two months after elections, Macron refuses to nominate progressive prime minister
• Facebook and Instagram Restrict the Use of the Red Triangle Emoji Over Hamas Association
• The 10 European countries that restrict religious attire for Muslim women
• EU court allows conditional headscarves bans at work
• Refugees who died off Italy 10 years ago remembered as new crisis flares
• Poland: Digital investigation proves Poland violated refugees’ rights
• Poland: Abortion Witch Hunt Targets Women, Doctors

What “healthy European” privacy looks like:

• The EU Funds Surveillance Around the World: Here’s What Must be Done About it
• AI mass surveillance at Paris Olympics – a legal scholar on the security boon and privacy nightmare
• Investigation of the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware
• 20 biggest GDPR fines so far [2024] (the fines in question are negligible, and only serve to line the pockets of the rich)
• Female health apps aren’t doing enough to protect sensitive data, study says

I’ve re-read this several times and I still don’t have the slightest clue to what you’re referring to, lib. It’s clear-as-day that you’re just another “They hate us for our freedom” folks and don’t actually care about freedom or privacy for all.

https://lemmy.ml/post/21062401/14129710

Projection is a hell of a drug.

uncivilized threats to national security VS. wholesome expats

ITALIAN MIGRATION MOVEMENTS, 1876 TO 1926, Page 23 of the excerpt

edit: forgot to highlight Dutch East Indies colony. Big L on my part.

Here’s an exercise for you that may require critical thinking (which evidently, you seem very averse to): Can you list out things that are invalid, dishonest and/or blatantly false in the article? Ensure to quote the parts that fit this category of “invalid, dishonest and/or false” and justify why, while citing sources that you believe to not be in this category.