Jamablaya

Ok we’re done here, you can’t not lie about the actual events and I won’t longer entertain political discussion with those that can’t at least do that. BTW, it’s really funny you calling me the authoritarian, considering your (see, not “you’re”, buddy) evident ideology. Do you seriously not know the Rittenhouse trial is long, long over? JFC.

No, dude. you aren’t. You’ve already exposed yourself even if you didn’t realize it then and want to backtrack now. Just another jerk off whose idea of right and wrong is which team.

The smart ones make sure their insurance covers international travel, same as I did.

It’s when a jury decides the person charged did commit the crime, but they for what ever reason thinks under the circumstances, he should be acquitted anyways. When you do hear about it, it’s often in the context of some parent being acquitted for murdering a pedophile, that interfered with the killers kids.

Sure looks like it huh?

Court entirely disagreed with your scenario, even the survivor admitted he was attacking.

Why are you so dependant on the court acknowledged and recorded reality of what happened being false? Your rhetoric doesn;t work with facts, so you ignore those instead of constructing an argument that works within reality, for some reason. People like you cry about rittenhouse and that pearl guy, and then go celebrate Luigi.

So if you ain’t no better than what you claim he is, why you mad, bro?

oh ffs. you are clearly unaware of how laws work in the particular states where this occurred, and are trying to staple vaguely European or Canadian laws on to the situation, mostly which are considered pretty fascist by those under them.