Avatar

Free_Thoughts

Free_Thoughts@feddit.uk
Joined
2 posts • 29 comments

Independent thinker valuing discussions grounded in reason, not emotions.

I say unpopular things but never something I know to be untrue. Always open to hear good-faith counter arguments. My goal is to engage in dialogue that seeks truth rather than scoring points.

Direct message

I went thru the profiles of 10 different users whose comments were on top of the most popular subreddits and none of them seemed like bot profiles. I’m quite confident in my original statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t think that being incorrect about something is bad in itself as long as one is not intentionally spreading disinformation. If one is confidently incorrect then they’re probably going to get a reply from someone else who is confidently correct. I’m not so much imagining a tool like this to create a social media experience free of mis- and disinformation but rather just make it a nicer place for people to be while at the same time encouragining reasonability and intellectual honesty.

permalink
report
parent
reply

brake lines

You want people, their family and innocent bystanders to die because they bought a car from a company of which CEO you don’t like?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Let’s all just start vandalizing things we don’t like. I’m sure that’s a world everyone wants to live in.

permalink
report
reply

blinking rear light

Blinking lights are my pet-peeve with cyclists. Cars don’t have blinking lights - neither should bikes.

permalink
report
reply

I’ve often thought about how social media might change if we had a fair way to rank users based on the quality of the content they post - perhaps with the help of a benign and truly competent AI for example. This AI could analyze everyone’s post history to assess how they engage with others. People who are intellectually honest and participate in good faith would be ranked higher, while those making broad generalizations, demonizing others, being mean, or just low-effort shitposting would rank lower.

If enough people fed up with online toxicity enabled such a filter, the most toxic users would suddenly find themselves shouting into the void. This would discourage toxic behavior and encourage users to put more thought and effort into their contributions. Unlike the current system, where saying popular things can easily rack up upvotes, this tool would hold people accountable for the actual quality of their engagement.

Ideally, everyone should be faced with information every day that they feel is a little uncomfortable and goes against their prior beliefs but also realise is probably true.

permalink
report
reply

…after finding out they lied about the actual amount of bots there.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s laminated glass. Those window breaking tools only work for tempered glass. You might get it to spiderweb but the plastic layer between the glass panels is still going to hold it intact.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Implying that “the right” as a whole supports rape is such a ridiculous thing to say.

permalink
report
parent
reply