-4 points

How’s this a meme?

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

It’s not, it’s a twittex screen cap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Your face is a meme.*

Seriously, screenshat your face. Call it a meme. If others adopt it, it’s a meme.

*^Not legal advice^

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

meme /mēm/ noun

A unit of cultural information, such as a cultural practice or idea, that is transmitted verbally or by repeated action from one mind to another.

This is a meme

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

That’s the definition of cultural, not internet meme, which is a much more broader definition. Internet memes are generally supposed to be amusing, ironic or relatable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s meta-ironic. Not that the post is irony, but his actions are.

What is the meaning of irony? a situation in which something which was intended to have a particular result has the opposite or a very different result

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Don’t make me tap the sign with the description of meme from The Selfish Gene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

First of all, Elon is probably just trying to do some marketing bullshit But Brazilian STF is full of crap also, Alexandre de Moraes is Just censoring people without any judgment or justification, he tried to prohibit the use of vpn and created a “fake news” committee where he get to say what is real or not

permalink
report
reply
2 points

He tried, he can try whatever he wants, it’s not him who decide

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I tried searching for sources that back up the claim that the judge created a fake news committee under his control and couldn’t find anything.

Not saying it’s false, but do you have a source for that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sorry, I think I translated poorly by “fake news committee” i was referring to the “inquérito das fake news”.

This was very controversial even when was born, so you probably will find a lot in Brazilian fonts.

https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/entenda-as-controversias-do-inquerito-das-fake-news-relatado-por-moraes-ha-mais-de-5-anos/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The whole ordeal is still going in under some secrecy, but I suspect the main parts that make it controversial are these, from the given article:

  • When the inquiry began, it was from an “elastic” understanding of the internal regiment of the Supreme Court. It’s a process that, under normal circumstances, requires either a police or the Public Ministry to ask to investigate first.
  • In a lone vote against opening the inquiry, judge Marco Aurelio said the process should’ve begun via the Procuradoria Geral da República
  • Everything is still going under secrecy.
  • There’s no definite end in sight for the investigations

The Brazilian STF has MANY flaws, chief among them of having no “power” that oversees it (the senate does, in theory, but no senator is dumb enough to fight the judiciary), but Moraes is the only son of a bitch with a sprinkle of decency (which I don’t expect to last past this “hunt” on the far right) and actually being proactive, unlike every other judge who is a morose sloth that will only react through “notas de repúdio” (notice of disapproval) that nobody gives a single flying fuck about and sit on fucking cases for over a year because there’s nobody to tell them to do their fucking job correctly*

Very important to keep in mind is the context. During the entirety of bozonazi’s presidency (2019-2022), it was a known “secret” that he used everything he could to incite people against the supreme court. The Gabinete do Ódio (Hate Cabinet), which kept the crazies “informed” with bullshit, was a fact known by everyone. Among said crazies were the fuckers that, in june 2020, fired fireworks at the STF building as a “warning”. Bozo and his flunkies threatened the supreme court every fucking week and bozo himself used a meeting with foreign dignitaries to cast doubt on the voting machines. To think all those threats were empty would be pure stupidity, especially when they culminated with the January 8 failed coup.

*Just look at Gilmar Mendes and his famous “perdido de vista” with ADI 4.650, where the old fart sat on the case for 18 months. It wanted to make it illegal for companies and corporations to finance political campaigns. The old fat fuck was in favor of keeping them legal but he knew if the judgement continued, his vote would lose, so he just sat on the case while the 2014 elections rolled with lots and lots of corporate money flowing around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You know they dont

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And I am not they, I do not speak for a group or Nothing of sorts, I just feel sad when my country situation is just overlooked, please don’t put me in the same basket as whatever you was putting me

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Why, oh, why, Bluesky and not Mastodon

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Because Mastodon needs a reliable instance with a catchy domain name. Maybe even the slightest bit of advertising.

Someone reputable could make a real Twitter competitor for about $2m a year these days.

I’d say Mozilla, but they just took all their social media funding away and threw it at AI. Genius.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d say Mozilla, but they just took all their social media funding away and threw it at AI.

Nobody was using their instance from what I heard. So a bit of a wasted effort.

What sort of money are they throwing at AI? I only know about the sidebar and that’s basically just a tab to a website of your choosing. Couldn’t have been expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They never allowed people to use it. There was a wait-list. It never opened afaik outside of Mozilla people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mozilla is all in on ads actually

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Would you worry Google would have too much influence?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s rather see NYTimes get into it. Even if they time allow outside signups on their instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I would worry that Google will simply discontinue the product abruptly. Google is unreliable with product longevity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

mastodon.world? mastodon.social?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Which don’t exactly have the name recognition of The New York Times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sadly, Mastodon had its shot during the pandemic and blew it. The non-tech savvy didn’t understand how federation worked and they marketed themselves very poorly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree, but there was also the problem of Mastodon has no marketing budget. Before Musk closed the sale on Twitter, they had 2 full time employees, IIRC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But Bluesky is federated as well; why isn’t that a problem for Bluesky either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I think one of the biggest reasons is that the Fediverse is often a pain to get into and sometimes a pain to use.

Bluesky and Threads “just work.”

Some people say it’s marketing and in Threads’ case I can believe it, but I haven’t seen any example of large marketing campaign by Bluesky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How is Bluesky easier to use when it’s literally also federated? And you can just create an account on any Mastodon instance like mastodon.world or mastodon.social and start using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It may be easier because Bluesky already made the choice for you, you don’t need to pick an instance, the default is Bluesky Social and that’s it, if you want a different one you can search it or make one. It removes that tiny mental block of having to commit to a server you don’t know if you will like.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

That’s inaccurate and reductive. ATproto and ActivityPub do not federate the same way, and how they work greatly affects how users interact with the entire ecosystem.

On Mastodon, pick the wrong instance and there’s content you’ll never see, migration isn’t complete, discovery is so bad they started a new initiative to try fixing it, instances have their own cultures, and so on.

Bluesky has issues, some I’d consider critical, but they’re not directly user-facing for the most part. Make an account, you get the same experience as everyone else.

edit: Sorry, I have this issue where I try to be concise, yet feel like I end up being rude. I get your confusion, but they’re quite different. Hopefully this helped; I can elaborate if you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I wonder whether it was the right decision to not federate with Threads.

On the one hand, yes, they would have caused a lot of problematic content, but on the other hand, it would have meant a lot of new users, and that would have livened up the place a bit. I guess.

Maybe we could do a switch in the user profile for Lemmy where it says “show Thread posts in All posts”. Or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Because outside of the Fediverse, literally no one has heard of Mastodon. No one has heard of the Fediverse either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Mastodon has more users than Bluesky. (I fear it won’t stay like that for a long time anymore though as Bluesky has a bigger growth rate.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Size doesn’t matter imo, especially not between an organically growing distributed user-ran network and a corporate Twitter wannabe who, despite calls of wanting to decentralise, basically have 99% of users on its main instance

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

All those people and its never managed to show me anything I felt was worthy of following.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The budget for Mastodon gGmbH is measured in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and Bluesky’s is much more than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yet, Bluesky didn’t even support video posts until two weeks ago. Many other highly requested features are still missing. To what extent does the success of each platform come down to money? What did Bluesky do with a larger budget to get an edge?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My recollection is that they advertised and got Important People™ to post there as part of their invite-only beta. Don’t quote me on this, but I believe they paid some of these people to create accounts and post there. Not sure if that was a rumor or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Cause all the Linux people, FOSS people, and communists are already here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because people, even leftists, want the bad company to be replaced by a good company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why replace horrible company with bad company run by literally THE guy that let the prior company become horrible instead of replacing it with good non-profit network?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you talking about Dorsey? Because if so, he left Bluesky as he didn’t like their focus on moderation.

Not that it matters much, I sincerely doubt most users look up such details before joining anything. It’s all about the experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

FOMO. More celebrities are on Bluesky than Mastodon and people don’t care enough about open protocols and so forth to forego that. If Taylor Swift was only on some Fediverse-enabled platform and nothing else, people would come here in droves. Taylor Swift does not post on Mastodon so people don’t want an account here. Replace Taylor Swift for anyone of any sort of popularity and ask the same questions.

I do wonder who the most famous person in the world is that exclusively posts on a Fediverse-platform. It could very well be Eugen Rochko, who probably has about a 0.05% name recognition throughout the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Mastodon has serious UX problems that even other federated networks don’t have. I’m pretty well tech literate and love Lemmy, for instance, but I just couldn’t ever get Mastodon to stick for me, like it just didn’t have the right feel and wasn’t fun to use. And if it’s not working for me then it’s never going to take off with a more general audience.

Bluesky is a lot better. It still has some issues that I feel keep it from fully replacing Twitter, especially Twitter before Elon screwed it up. But it does manage to keep me checking it, even though it’s probably only once or twice a week max.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Stay on blue sky guys.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

And keep leaving Twitter!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There’s no way I’m leaving Twitter… because I never joined.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good job!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Why BlueSky or even Threads tho?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I dunno, I follow some political, rap, and basketball YouTubers and they all use Twitter. I’d much rather them use Bluesky or Threads. I think Mastodon would probably be best but so far, anything’s better than Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because “it’s where people are going” - plus those two are already well known among normies, unlike mastodon/misskey/fediverse. They want a centralized thing.

Funnily enough, during this brazilian exodus, my sister complained that Threads was too “clean”, while bluesky had all the “people with questionable mental stability” and was thus more interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 978

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments