You don’t understand how debate works, you assume every thing you post is gospel and can’t handle people questioning your sources.
Then you make these insane claims that you’ll provide sources or debate in good faith if some subjective mark is met which never gets met.
It’s clear your afraid you always look for excuses not to. Maybe there is a grade school debate club where you can practice.
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.
1.4K
Monthly active users
523
Posts
3.5K
Comments
